Posted 20 hours ago
I've been with two different guys and they both can't last more than 10-15 minutes, is it me? Am I doing something wrong?
Anonymous asked

theanticlimactic:

mysterywriteher:

No it is definitely not you. Guys are selfish and frequently don’t think about even trying to perform long because in their mind it’s all about them. The sooner they orgasm, the sooner they feel like the sex is “over.”

That’s a bit of a hasty generalization of men.

O.o Who has mysterywriteher been having sex with? I mean seriously? All men only think about their own orgasm? So the guy who eats out his gf even if they do not have sex afterwards is only thinking about his orgasm? Or the guy who just cuddles with their gf while fingering her until she cums and then watches as she falls asleep is only thinking about his orgasm? I fail to see the logic especially since they are clearly not taking into account not everyone has the same levels of stamina.

Posted 1 day ago

fartgallery:

fartgallery:

fartgallery:

fartgallery:

I got home from school and found a cat on my bridge

image

IT RAN IN MY HOUSE WHEN I OPENED THE DOOR AND WONT LEAVE

image

this is breaking my heart :(

image

i guess i have a cat now

image

This seems like the opposite of a problem if you ask me. Especially since it is friendly. :D

Posted 2 days ago
What are examples of men being treated as sex objects and not as human beings? Or being objectified in general?
Anonymous asked

dontneedfeminism:

yayitsjenni:

tiredofbeingborncriminal:

dontneedfeminism:

yayitsjenni:

dontneedfeminism:

Only the 3rd & 4th ads show men being objectified. The rest is of hot men who are just showing off how hot they are. Nothing wrong with that. No one should apologize for being proud of the way they look.

So you don’t think that the ad where the woman has 2 naked men on a leash is objectifying, or at the very least dehumanizing?

How about the one where there’s a line of men begging at the feet of one woman?

Not to mention women simply showing off stunning bodies is referred to as being objectified when feminists get involved. So when the opposite is done somehow that’s okay?

Ummm, I’m a feminist and I see nothing wrong with women posing naked at all as long as it’s consensual. IMO, the 2nd and 3rd pic are objectifying because it’s reducing them to body parts. Jeez, guys get so but thrust when they get treated like women lol

No, we get upset when we’re treated the same, but you wanna act like women are still being treated worse.

Posted 2 days ago

http://yarriinwonderland.tumblr.com/post/95242347101/alessandrogiovanni1-yarriinwonderland

alessandrogiovanni1:

yarriinwonderland:

alessandrogiovanni1:

yarriinwonderland:

prettyboyshyflizzy:

whitegirlsaintshit:

[snipped]

Or she’s polygamous, and he’s monogamous? I don’t see what’s inherently emasculating about it?

I think it’s the poor wording in…

Yarri you are a smart person but at the same time I think you are misinterpreting what I am saying. Yes I agree it is the responsibility of the partner who doesn’t want that kind of relationship to be up front and honest with their partner but those who don’t want that kind of relationship but agree to it anyway often do so out of fear. They are afraid of loosing their relationship, or their kids (in divorce), and ultimately do something they do not want sacrificing their own happiness for their partner’s or one of many other reasons.

Yes I do not agree with it because I personally can see it as cruel especially if it is a requirement for you to be in a relationship with someone or to continue one. Yes I will never participate in such a relationship because I could never put myself or someone else through that kind of emotional thing.

Does this mean I don’t think anyone can do it? No of course not. It just takes very specific types of people, and if that makes them happy that is their choice.

(Source: thatsmoderatelyraven)

Posted 2 days ago

dumblr—feminist:

This starts off kind of okay but then jumps right back into “How to silence male victims because female rape is far worse” propaganda. Do feminists not realize that at this point, people are saying “MEN GET RAPED TOO” Because FEMINISTS DENY THAT MEN CAN BE RAPED? In fact feminists straight up deny men can even be abused. They deny that men can be assaulted. Feminist theory wrote an entire model used in court cases to show that men could never be the victim of female domestic aggression. There are so many campaigns about “Don’t be that guy” and “she doesn’t deserve it” male victims of sexual assault get ignored. A LOT. The reason people are adding this in ISN’T TO SILENCE FEMALE VICTIMS. In fact, at this point if any gender gets MORE attention when it comes to sexual assault now, it’s women. Stop fooling yourselves. If anything people need to be reminded MORE that men can be victims as well. Because feminists are trying their hardest to silence them, with posts just like this one.

Posted 2 days ago

yarriinwonderland:

alessandrogiovanni1:

yarriinwonderland:

prettyboyshyflizzy:

whitegirlsaintshit:

CUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

this is the most emasculating thing ive ever heard you watching the kids while she slurping and riding on other niggas

Or she’s polygamous, and he’s monogamous? I don’t see what’s inherently emasculating about it?

I think it’s the poor wording in the article that makes it seem emasculating.. 

"This Means that Megan is Free to date other men, while Brian must remain exclusive to Megan."

It is the word “must” that makes it sound like he doesn’t have a choice in the matter if he wants to keep the relationship. However If he has no problem with it that’s his choice. That being said I personally think it’s wrong because she is basically cheating on him without going behind his back and I would never put myself into a relationship like this but ultimately if they are honestly happy and he doesn’t care that is their choice. That being said when it comes out she gave him an STD or decides to leave him for some guy she was fucking while he was at home with the kids I will not be the least bit surprised. 

How is she “basically cheating on him”? If both of them are consenting, then where’s the cheating? Ethical polygamy and cheating aren’t the same thing.

Not by your standards but to me there is little difference. Sure one is where your partner “Doesn’t mind.” I am using quotations because I have seen this many times where people agree to it solely to please their partner even though it breaks their heart. Are there people genuinely ok with it? Sure but not all relationships like this are like that.

To me Ethical Polygamy is the same as saying “yeah I love you but I don’t love you enough to be exclusive and I am going to go fuck someone else good night sweetie see you when I am in the mood for you.”

(Source: thatsmoderatelyraven)

Posted 2 days ago

yarriinwonderland:

prettyboyshyflizzy:

whitegirlsaintshit:

CUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

this is the most emasculating thing ive ever heard you watching the kids while she slurping and riding on other niggas

Or she’s polygamous, and he’s monogamous? I don’t see what’s inherently emasculating about it?

I think it’s the poor wording in the article that makes it seem emasculating.. 

"This Means that Megan is Free to date other men, while Brian must remain exclusive to Megan."

It is the word “must” that makes it sound like he doesn’t have a choice in the matter if he wants to keep the relationship. However If he has no problem with it that’s his choice. That being said I personally think it’s wrong because she is basically cheating on him without going behind his back and I would never put myself into a relationship like this but ultimately if they are honestly happy and he doesn’t care that is their choice. That being said when it comes out she gave him an STD or decides to leave him for some guy she was fucking while he was at home with the kids I will not be the least bit surprised. 

(Source: thatsmoderatelyraven)

Posted 5 days ago

check-your-privilege-feminists:

Haha, really? So you, Jessica Valenti, are going to try to ride on the backs of feminists that actually fought for those rights and pretend like modern feminism is in any way comparable to feminism in the past? Get real. Feminists in the past fought for equal rights and fair treatment. Feminists today just bitch about the stupid shit like the friendzone and the fact that they can’t have their arses hanging out at school. Don’t try to guilt trip women into joining your modern ignorant vagina cult because of the things feminism did in the past. You do not get to take credit for that.

(Source: ohfalada)

Posted 5 days ago

celestialgeminize:

I think yesterday’s Purge scare should make everyone who took this shit seriously re-evaluate their life choices and say clear from social media for a while. A valuable lesson has been learnt in all of this though. Tumblr will believe just about anything on the internet. Good bye complex reasoning you will be missed in the years to come.

Wait what? Some people actually tried to create the purge in real life?

Posted 5 days ago

womenagainstwomyn:

If I had a dollar for every “that’s not a real feminist” argument from feminists.

Oh id be rolling in the cash. :)